I haven't been posting much for a while here, but I think it's about time for me to write a long-winded analysis of the game like I have in the past. So it's coming. You've been warned.
As for a quick note on my current feelings toward the state of the UGA program:
I try to step back and look at things realistically. No end of the world doom and gloom, but no "Disney Dawg" sparkling either (I've never liked the "Disney Dawg" term much, but you have to admit it's catchy). On the up side, I saw some good things (very few, but some) in last night's game. I know that we only lost one game, it was to a top 5 team, and it doesn't affect our SEC chances at all. Technically, we still have the whole season ahead of us, 11 games left to play, and an SEC title we're still fully in the race for. On the downside, well... there is a long and obvious list of grievances that I will go more into detail on later. We have many of the same problems we've had for years, and we seemingly refuse to ever try to change them. This is stubborn and stupid, and if we keep that up, we're looking at another long season. I'll still hold out hope that we can turn things around, but if a 6-7 year with a loss to UCF in a lower-tier bowl game with an entire off-season to prepare didn't bring change, I'm not too hopeful about seeing that change happen in the next week.
Sep 4, 2011
Aug 20, 2011
ESPN Predicts UGA in Capital One Bowl; Also, video of new uniforms from Georgiadogs.com
It's nice to be getting some love from the media (even if we don't yet deserve it).
First, today it was announced that Georgia is ranked #19 in the AP Poll, a few spots higher than in the Coaches'. I feel strange about a 6-7 team being ranked in the teens, but I'm not complaining. The higher the better for making it to a better bowl at the end of the year.
Then, ESPN's Mark Schlabach and Brad Edwards are both predicting UGA to play in the Capital One Bowl this season, versus either Ohio State or Nebraska, respectively. I can't say I would complain about either one of those scenarios.
As for our new uniforms that were released today, I will say this: I'm not a huge fan of how they look, mainly just because the matching jerseys and pants looks a little bit Arena Football League-ish for my tastes. However, I think it would be a pity if all of our complaining fans made the team less excited about wearing them for the big opener. Plus, I'm really glad they decided to release these images two weeks before the game so we can get used to them, unlike the fiasco that happened at the Cocktail Party in 2009.
By the way, the uniforms look a lot better in this video from the UGA athletics website. I'm thinking people will really warm up to them when they're being worn by the real Dawgs as they run out of the tunnel onto the field.
First, today it was announced that Georgia is ranked #19 in the AP Poll, a few spots higher than in the Coaches'. I feel strange about a 6-7 team being ranked in the teens, but I'm not complaining. The higher the better for making it to a better bowl at the end of the year.
Then, ESPN's Mark Schlabach and Brad Edwards are both predicting UGA to play in the Capital One Bowl this season, versus either Ohio State or Nebraska, respectively. I can't say I would complain about either one of those scenarios.
As for our new uniforms that were released today, I will say this: I'm not a huge fan of how they look, mainly just because the matching jerseys and pants looks a little bit Arena Football League-ish for my tastes. However, I think it would be a pity if all of our complaining fans made the team less excited about wearing them for the big opener. Plus, I'm really glad they decided to release these images two weeks before the game so we can get used to them, unlike the fiasco that happened at the Cocktail Party in 2009.
By the way, the uniforms look a lot better in this video from the UGA athletics website. I'm thinking people will really warm up to them when they're being worn by the real Dawgs as they run out of the tunnel onto the field.
Labels:
espn,
Georgia football,
uniforms
Jul 15, 2011
Welcome Back to the Backfield, Mr. Samuel
First off, thanks to the person who wrote three enormous comments on my last post about Tech. They were very enlightening.
Second, Richard Samuel is back at RB. Some may worry that this is a sign of things not looking so great in the current backfield of Crowell, Malcome, Thomas, and Harton. Others are quietly excited that maybe Samuel has the experience and motivation to actually compete and play at the position this year, or at least to provide good depth in case of disaster.
If you look for Samuel's player page on ESPN.com, you won't find any rushing stats right away. It does, however, list his tackles in 2009... while playing RB. (Just click on stats to see his rushing numbers)
Quick stats from 2009: Samuel rushed 88 attempts for 395 yards, for an average of 4.5 ypc, a long of 80, and 2 TDs.
Below is evidence of the said 80 yard run. Look at 'dem wheels.
Welcome back to the backfield, Mr. Samuel. Good luck, and Godspeed.
Labels:
UGA football
Jul 14, 2011
Tech Cheating Revealed on Harry Potter Day?
Yeah, I know it's been a while. But I'm back now, and all it took was the rejuvenating and all too familiar feeling of laughing at Tech's misery.
Everyone has seen by now that the Buzzing Bees are on probation and have to vacate the only thing they've won in recent history (2009 ACC Title). Aside from the fact that everyone knows that UGA won the ACC in 2009, does anyone else find it funny that Tech's cheating and punishment was revealed the same day as the final Harry Potter movie is coming out in theaters? (tonight at midnight, or so I hear)
This has to be the most bittersweet day in Tech history, and for the Head Wizard, Paul "Punch 'em in the face" Johnson.
Everyone has seen by now that the Buzzing Bees are on probation and have to vacate the only thing they've won in recent history (2009 ACC Title). Aside from the fact that everyone knows that UGA won the ACC in 2009, does anyone else find it funny that Tech's cheating and punishment was revealed the same day as the final Harry Potter movie is coming out in theaters? (tonight at midnight, or so I hear)
This has to be the most bittersweet day in Tech history, and for the Head Wizard, Paul "Punch 'em in the face" Johnson.
Labels:
Buzz Buzz,
Georgia Tech
May 1, 2011
Reason #738 Why Tech Sucks: The Case of the Missing Stafford
Clearly there isn't much to write about lately, so why not take a gander at what's going on in the wizarding world of Georgia Tech?
First, we have the big news about Tech's strong showing at the 2011 NFL draft. The Buzzing Bees had one player drafted, RB Anthony Allen, in the 7th round (officially pick #255) by the Baltimore Ravens. You would think that running back might be the only position not hampered by Head Wizard Johnson's triple option offense when it comes to time to join the pros, but I'm thinking that would be a wrong assumption. Just look at ESPN's recap of the Raven's picks, including this one sentence summary of Georgia Tech's Allen:
"Allen will need some development and coaching as a runner coming from the triple-option scheme at Georgia Tech."
Sounds to me like the triple-option is considered a liability, not just by the NFL, but by scouts and media like ESPN.
In other Tech news, you may have heard that Matt Stafford was throwing passes to Calvin Johnson and Chad Ochocinco the other day on Tech's fields. Here's a story that mentions the event and includes a photo of the three NFL players together in the Bobby Dodd governmental assistance structure for the football challenged.
Photo credit: @ochocinco himself
But if you're like me and you love to check out Georgia Tech websites looking for things to laugh at, you may have also noticed a post on Tech's official blog page. The headline of the post reads "Megatron and Ochocinco," the short paragraph is about how two of the best receivers in the NFL worked out on campus, and it then has a nice little photo of Calvin Johnson standing with Ochocinco in the Tech stadium.
But wait a second... there's no mention of Stafford anywhere in the post, and that photo happens to be the same photo of the three players that can be seen on the site I linked previously... except with Stafford cropped out.
Really, Georgia Tech? You're that offended by all things Georgia that you have to crop the 2009 #1 draft pick and starting Detroit QB from your photo AND the story?
Photo credit: Conspicuous Cropping Done by playatgatech.com
Really, Georgia Tech? You're that offended by all things Georgia that you have to crop the 2009 #1 draft pick and starting Detroit QB from your photo AND the story?
I assume this means any Tech fans who root for the Lions try to imagine that Stafford does not exist, and that whenever Calvin Johnson catches a ball, it was chucked miraculously into the air by a Tech-designed robot that probably looks like this. Sure, it probably helps that Stafford has barely played in the past 2 years due to injury, but they still have to imagine it every once in a while.
Keep on Ramblin', you wrecks.
Labels:
Georgia Tech,
Georgia Tech football
Apr 16, 2011
G-Day Trend: Today's Game a Bad Omen?
First of all, I think G-Day 2011 was a success in all the right ways. We got to see the defense do well in the 1st half, and the offense turn it on in the 2nd.
Aaron Murray looked excellent, going 12 of 17 for 122 yards and a TD, while the backups Mason and Lemay (and even walk-on Parker Welch) looked pretty solid themselves. Although Ealey and incoming hopeful star Isaiah Crowell weren't playing, Caleb King looked good with 30 yards on 5 carries and Ken Malcome had similar numbers (7 for 39) and a TD. The receivers didn't look spectacular, but they looked like a solid group that should be able to get things done with Murray throwing it to them. Orson Charles and Tavarres King, while not of AJ Green caliber (but who is?), are still capable of being SEC stars themselves. And of course Branden Smith was the star of the offense (is that right?) while catching and running the ball. The defense had plenty of standouts from Alec Ogletree (7 tackles), Reuben Faloughi (3 sacks, 3 TFL), Chase Vasser (7 tackles), and walk-on Connor Norman, who had 5 tackles and a very nice interception.
Now that that's all out of the way, WHAT ABOUT THE OMEN?
Last year I noticed a trend from recent G-Day games that showed how higher scoring spring games generally lead to better seasons. Based on the point scoring, last year's G-Day seemed to predict between a 9 and 10 win record for the Dawgs. But there was one problem: in the previous five G-Days, the Red team always won, but in 2010, the Black team won. I wondered if that could lead to some bizarro Bulldog season with catastrophic consequences. Unfortunately, it did.
Below is a chart of each G-Day, first listing the points scored by the winning team, then the total points in the game, and the following season's record.
2011: 18 points (29 total) ????????? (Black team wins)
2010: 17 points (24 total) 6-7 record (Black team wins)
Aaron Murray looked excellent, going 12 of 17 for 122 yards and a TD, while the backups Mason and Lemay (and even walk-on Parker Welch) looked pretty solid themselves. Although Ealey and incoming hopeful star Isaiah Crowell weren't playing, Caleb King looked good with 30 yards on 5 carries and Ken Malcome had similar numbers (7 for 39) and a TD. The receivers didn't look spectacular, but they looked like a solid group that should be able to get things done with Murray throwing it to them. Orson Charles and Tavarres King, while not of AJ Green caliber (but who is?), are still capable of being SEC stars themselves. And of course Branden Smith was the star of the offense (is that right?) while catching and running the ball. The defense had plenty of standouts from Alec Ogletree (7 tackles), Reuben Faloughi (3 sacks, 3 TFL), Chase Vasser (7 tackles), and walk-on Connor Norman, who had 5 tackles and a very nice interception.
Now that that's all out of the way, WHAT ABOUT THE OMEN?
Last year I noticed a trend from recent G-Day games that showed how higher scoring spring games generally lead to better seasons. Based on the point scoring, last year's G-Day seemed to predict between a 9 and 10 win record for the Dawgs. But there was one problem: in the previous five G-Days, the Red team always won, but in 2010, the Black team won. I wondered if that could lead to some bizarro Bulldog season with catastrophic consequences. Unfortunately, it did.
Below is a chart of each G-Day, first listing the points scored by the winning team, then the total points in the game, and the following season's record.
2011: 18 points (29 total) ????????? (Black team wins)
2010: 17 points (24 total) 6-7 record (Black team wins)
2009: 13 points (16 total), 8-5 record
2006: 14 points (24 total), 9-4 record
2008: 17 points (20 total), 10-3 record
2005: 21 points (33 total), 10-3 record (winning SEC)
2007: 34 points (55 total), 11-2 record
Last season was filled with catastrophe. First, there were plenty of off-season arrests through the spring and summer, then a crazy NCAA investigation led to the Dawgs losing AJ Green for the first four games. Very unfortunate fumbles and other strange happenings (along with just plain bad coaching or play) ended up in a losing season.
So while a few more points were scored this year at G-Day, which would alone predict between a 10 win season, the Black team has won again. Things are different this year, though. While in the past, the Red team has almost always been the first team offense, this year the teams were drafted and randomized, so the winner doesn't really matter as much. So far, this has been a great spring for the Dawgs, with no real bad news and a "Dream Team" recruiting class. So maybe things will turn out different in 2011. The good news is, this entire trend is hopefully ridiculous and only worth discussion for fun.
I'll just hope that the 2011 Bulldog squad won't worry about any trends or records from the past, put last year's catastrophic results behind them, and look toward an SEC Championship (and perhaps more) in the fall.
Labels:
G-Day,
Georgia football
Apr 1, 2011
Kids "Calling the Dawgs" in UGAnda?
Not an April Fool's joke, I promise. The April Fool's joke appears to be the fact that I actually posted something.
Watch awesome video below:
Watch awesome video below:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)